Constitutional law prof demonstrates stunning ignorance |

Re-blogged from Polipundit:

Posted on April 2, 2012 by wcvarones

Does he think we don’t remember what happened? And that we can’t check facts on the Internet?

CBS News:

“Ultimately I am confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress,” Mr. Obama said in the Rose Garden appearance.

Strong majority? It passed 219-212 after months of backroom deals, bribery, arm-twisting, and lies. That’s a strong majority?

Unprecedented? How about the Flag Protection Act of 1989? It passed the House 380-38 and the Senate 91-9. Now that’s a strong majority. And then the Supreme Court went ahead and precedented all over it.

Want another precedent? How about McCain-Feingold? That passed 240-189 and then got struck down by a Supreme Court that could read the First Amendment.

I’m no Constitutional law professor, and I came up with those two precedents off the top of my head. �What the hell are they teaching at Harvard Law?

Being willfully ignorant of historical precedent is bad enough. But Obama’s statement indicates he doesn’t even understand the basic concept of having a Constitution. �His argument would mean that the Supreme Court and the Constitution are completely irrelevant and Congress can always do whatever it wants. If you went to Chicago and Obama was your professor for Constitutional law, you might want to take a refresher course.

via Constitutional law prof demonstrates stunning ignorance |


About Russ Steele
Freelance writer and climate change blogger. Russ spent twenty years in the Air Force as a navigator specializing in electronics warfare and digital systems. After his service he was employed for sixteen years as concept developer for TRW, an aerospace and automotive company, and then was CEO of a non-profit Internet provider for 18 months. Russ's articles have appeared in Comstock's Business, Capitol Journal, Trailer Life, Monitoring Times, and Idaho Magazine.

2 Responses to Constitutional law prof demonstrates stunning ignorance |

  1. sean2829 says:

    It seems he’s already started to campaign against the supreme court. Remember, the hearings were Monday through Wed. and they likely took a vote last Friday and assigned out the opinion writing. Is it possible he has an inkling of what the decision is already?

  2. Kagan told him.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: