More Proof That Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate Maybe a FAKE!

Russ Steele

Nick Case writing at  the American Thinker has more proof that the long form birth certificate is a fake, or the person preparing the document has access to three different typewriters and used all three in preparing the form.

Read Nick’s analysis HERE.  If you think Nick has made some serious mistakes in his analysis let’s hear your analysis.

I have no proof that Obama was not born in the US, only that his birth certificate is a fake. Why is it a fake? I will let you draw your own conclusions.


About Russ Steele
Freelance writer and climate change blogger. Russ spent twenty years in the Air Force as a navigator specializing in electronics warfare and digital systems. After his service he was employed for sixteen years as concept developer for TRW, an aerospace and automotive company, and then was CEO of a non-profit Internet provider for 18 months. Russ's articles have appeared in Comstock's Business, Capitol Journal, Trailer Life, Monitoring Times, and Idaho Magazine.

13 Responses to More Proof That Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate Maybe a FAKE!

  1. Careful Russ, those lefty’s will call you an extremist. Even if you are only the messenger.

    • Dixon Cruickshank says:

      Todd they do at least once a week about something or nothing at all LOL

      I’m not really sure why this was even put out it is so bad, other than it was suppsed to be that bad who knows.

  2. Martin Light says:

    A year ago this month Obama stood in front of media cameras supposedly putting the birth certificate issue to rest but since then what he held up has been proven to be a fake. What’s become more important and verifiable is his use of someone else’s social security #042-68-4425 issued in Conneticut and which was then used to register (#61-1125539-1) with the Selective Service. Any one doing the same would be charged with felonies under Federal Law.

    • Brad Croul says:

      Verifiable? Snopes says SSNGate is “fantastical tale”. That this drama was created in the mind of some paranoid crackpot sounds much more plausible to me.

      • Russ says:

        Right! Snopes is funding by George Soros through various means, one has to calibrate everything this husband and wife Snope team puts out. They lean left.

        That said, why not just enter Obama’s SSN in E-Verify and see what the results are?

      • Brad Croul says:

        This is interesting,

        On July 2, 1980, however, President Carter signed Proclamation 4771, Registration Under the Military Selective Service Act, retroactively re-establishing the Selective Service registration requirement for all 18–26 year old male citizens born on or after January 1, 1960.[13] Only men born between March 29, 1957, and December 31, 1959, were completely exempt from Selective Service registration.[14] The first registrations after Proclamation 4771 took place on Monday, July 21, 1980, for those men born in January, February and March 1960 at U.S. Post Offices. Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays were reserved for men born in the later quarters of the year, and registration for men born in 1961 began the following week.[15] – Wiki

        Obama supposedly registered within 30 days of this new law going into effect. I bet there was mass confusion, as a bunch of men had to rush out and register.

        Notice also that he dated his form July 30 but the stamp on the right says July 29
        OMG! What have I uncovered!

  3. gjrebane says:

    The real question about the obvious long form forgery is why has not a single one of our Republican representatives – McClintock, Logue, LaMalfa – made a public peep about it.

    • Russ says:

      One of my first questions when I have a public opportunity. I want to hear the blubbering up front and personal.

  4. Michael Anderson says:

    George asked: “The real question about the obvious long form forgery is why has not a single one of our Republican representatives – McClintock, Logue, LaMalfa – made a public peep about it?”

    Maybe because they know that the issue would end up at the Supreme Court, and they would throw it out. Why? Because there is no question that Obama’s mother was a US citizen at the time of his birth. Even if he was born on the moon, it wouldn’t make a bit of difference.

    • gjrebane says:

      I’m not aware of any precedence of having a child be declared “natural born” by SCOTUS, when actually born of an American citizen on foreign soil as a citizen of his father’s native land, then becoming a citizen of a second foreign country, and then representing himself as such in America – and then going on to clumsily attempt to prove birth on American soil with a sophomorically doctored document.

      Given the evidence, its ending up at SCOTUS would be the right and proper thing to clear the air on the constitutional qualifications for President. You can bet the ranch that Obama’s mysterious past is just the camel’s nose under the tent; there will soon be another contender with equally murky credentials vying for the office in our borderless, multi-cultural, globe embracing land.

      • Michael Anderson says:

        You misjudge the Military/Security Industrial Complex George, which surprises me since you have vast experience delving its various pipes and tubes.

        Do you really think the DIA/NSA/CIA/DHS/Blahblahblah will tolerate the upset of having a sitting president go through something like this? Of course not.

        This will not be an issue in the coming campaign, you can count on it. Nor will it matter if Obama is reelected, the horse will have long left the barn by then.

        Sorry to say, this one goes into the same “George Bush and Dick Cheney are guilty of war crimes but those charges will never see the light of day” American Disappearance bucket. Time to move on, and if you are upset that the US Constitution is not being honored, join that huge and growing club my friend.

  5. Here is some more tests that you can do yourself to prove that that the long form certificate is a fraud.

    Have fun. No it does not prove where Obama was born, only that his birth certificate is a fraud. The question is why does he need a fake birth certificate?

    • Michael Anderson says:

      As I said to George above, Russ, it doesn’t matter. The DIA/NSA/CIA/DHS/Blahblahblah machine has already spoken. You are trying to discuss this issue with facts and logic. That’s not how it works anymore. The fix is in. Time to move on…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: