Birth Certificates In a Historical Context

Russ Steele

Today Romney was in his home state and said that no one had asked him for his birth certificate. That quip caused the lefties some heart pounding palpitations.  They pointed out that Obama has a birth certificate which he has shared with the press.  Yes, he did. However,  that birth certificate raises some interesting questions. No I am not talking about the technical PDF problems that indicate it was a fraud, which have been discussed before, I am talking about those questions that any history buff might ask:

  •  Back in 1961 people of color were called ‘Negroes.’ So how can the

Obama ‘birth certificate’ state he is ‘African-American’ when the term
wasn’t even used at that time? This term not widely used until the late 1980s. Details HERE.

  • The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s

birth as August 4, 1961. It indicates that Barack Hussein Obama was
his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama’s birth, it also
shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama’s father
was born in ” Kenya, East Africa “. This wouldn’t seem like anything
of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963,
two whole years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s
birth.

How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet
exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as
the ” British East Africa Protectorate”.  More details HERE.

  • On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed

place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”.
This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were
called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity
Home”, respectively. The name did not change to Kapi’olani Maternity &
Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged.

How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate
dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978? More details HERE.

Maybe some of our local lefties have answers for these questions. I have do not have any problems with the idea that Obama was born in the US, my issue are who were his real parents and why was it necessary to create a fake birth certificate?

H/T to a regular reader of this blog for providing the questions in an e-mail.

Advertisements

About Russ Steele
Freelance writer and climate change blogger. Russ spent twenty years in the Air Force as a navigator specializing in electronics warfare and digital systems. After his service he was employed for sixteen years as concept developer for TRW, an aerospace and automotive company, and then was CEO of a non-profit Internet provider for 18 months. Russ's articles have appeared in Comstock's Business, Capitol Journal, Trailer Life, Monitoring Times, and Idaho Magazine.

45 Responses to Birth Certificates In a Historical Context

  1. Arthur M. Day. says:

    Don’t be quick to judge, all this could possibly be in the”Penumbra” of truthiness, perhaps.

  2. stevefrisch says:

    One answer for you, fear. Romney cracked the joke because he needs white votes to win and he wants to paint our President as a welfare loving, foreign, dangerous black man.

    http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/08/romneys-birther-joke-explained-one-number-he-needs-61-white-vote-win/56192/

    • Michael R. Kesti says:

      It’s sufficient for me, Steve, to paint our president as a welfare loving, foreign, dangerous man. I genuinely do not care about the color of his skin. I am certain that there are some who do so care but I believe that their numbers a relatively small. This continual accusation anybody who opposes our president is a racist suggests a desperate intent to demonize and I find it disgusting.

  3. Arthur M. Day. says:

    Ah, the race card. I think it has eclipsed patriotism as the last refuge.

    • Todd Juvinall says:

      Arthur, and that from a fellow I have asked many times what the makeup of his staff is. He never responds because he is a racial hypocrite.

  4. benjaminemery says:

    First President of color and his legitimacy is challenged by claiming he is not American. Nope, I can’t see how anyone could see this as racist.

  5. stevefrisch says:

    LIsten guys, this is a canard and you all know it. It is a continuation of the ‘welfare president’, “food stamp president’, ‘affirmative action president’, ‘european president’, ‘Kenyan socialist president’, ‘real American’, narrative that is simply dog-whistle racism in a cloak (some may say hood).

    All of this ‘Birther’ nonsense is code for saying the President is not American. He is not ‘one of us’. He is alien. Every one of the above narratives plays into a fear of change. Fear of a future nation where it is majority minority rather than majority European descent.

    Here is the classic example: Newt Gingrich’s 2010 statement in the National Review that Americans should be concerned that Obama is ’so outside our comprehension, that only if you understand Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior’ can you understand his actions. Gingrich clearly seeks to to portray Obama as non-American, and thus ‘un-American.’

    Lest there be any doubt that racial anxieties about Obama are linked to fears of the destruction of the nation itself, consider the motto which graces the ‘Birther’ website: ‘Dedicated to the rebirth of our constitutional republic.’ Thus, the ‘Birthers’ explicitly style Obama’s allegedly foreign birth as a threat to the nation, necessitating a new birth for the nation itself. While the ‘Birther’ narrative typically carefully avoids explicit racial references, it is clearly using foreignness–national ‘Other’ness–as a stand-in for racial otherness.

    And almost every one of the commentators here, embracing the ‘Birther’ narrative are also regularly make the obligatory Hitler/Lenin/Stalin/Marx comparisons: ‘Lenin and Stalin had the ‘Bourgeois,’ Hitler had the ‘Untermenschen,’ Pol Pot had the ‘Intelligentsia,’ etc…. and now Obama has the ‘Birthers.’ or conservatives, or real Americans.

    By doing this you increase the fear people feel about change and attempt to create a support group and political constituency out of people who share ‘victimhood’. This is a classic scapegoat strategy–you need people who need someone to blame for their own inadequacies, fears, failures–a scapegoat for their failures. You need the Other.

    Your comparisons seek to frame Obama as a national Other, more akin to foreign leaders than other U.S. presidents. And in the implicit framing of the ‘Birthers’ as potential victims of whatever ‘genocidal’ program Obama allegedly supports.

    I can hear the howls now: I had a black friend in high school; I worked with black people as equals; my kids have black (or brown) friends. But that does not excuse or change the fact that you support candidates and policies that continue to disempower people of color in American politics, society and culture; regularly appeal to fear of losing European-American culture; and repeat and embrace the dog-whistle that race baiting Republican candidates serve you up like pablum for weak minds.

    The policy of the Republican party is a continued white dominance of the American system based on three central themes. First, continued racial dominance by white Americans in the most important positions of power; second, a gradual expansion of who counts as white along socio-racial lines rather than bio-racial lines; and third, a professed colorblind philosophy that proclaims anti-racism while simultaneously working to prevent racial inclusion or any policies that remediate the effects of 400 years of endemic racism.

    Lets face it Boys, you are armchair racists…and no amount of deny it is going to cloak your true colors under the sheet.

    • Michael R. Kesti says:

      Only the most liberal of lefties could write more than 500 words that are accurately summarized by, “I am a better judge of what you think than are you.”

      • stevefrisch says:

        Well Michael, I am a better judge of what you think than you are…..Birtherism is racism pure and simple.

      • Todd Juvinall says:

        Priceless!

      • Michael R. Kesti says:

        1) Would birtherism still be racism if our president were Caucasian but in every other way the same?

        2) I have never made statements that would logically lead to classifying me as a birther.

        It appears to me that you overestimate the veracity of your judgement.

      • stevefrisch says:

        Lets see Michael, at the risk of actually using words to answer your question, the Congressional Research Office defines the natural born citizen clause:

        “The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term “natural born” citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship “by birth” or “at birth”, either by being born “in” the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to alien parents; by being born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents; or by being born in other situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship “at birth”. Such term, however, would not include a person who was not a U.S. citizen by birth or at birth, and who was thus born an “alien” required to go through the legal process of “naturalization” to become a U.S. citizen.”

        Under these provisions President Obama would qualify as a natural born citizen since his mother was a US citizen. So regardless of the veracity of any of the ‘Birther’ arguments, they are full of shinola. Unless of course they are claiming that Stanley Ann Dunham was not a citizen.

        Perhaps the most recent challenge to the citizenship of a President or Presidential candidate was made questioning John McCain’s qualification; a charge that I and almost all partisans on behalf of President (then candidate) Obama said was absolute nonsense since he was born to an American serviceman (John McCain Jr.) who was serving as the executive office aboard a US submarine stationed in the Panama Canal Zone at the time. Even if, as some claim, he was born in Colon City, making him a Panamanian citizen, he was born of US parents, and thus a US citizen.

        The issue goes to not only the motivate of those claiming Obama is not a citizen but also to the framing of the case they make; challenging his citizenship while simultaneously painting him as ‘un-American’ or ‘anti-American’. The TWO TOGETHER create the dog-whistle race argument, not any single challenge.

        Your culpability comes in when those here make the claim, with the frame of racism, and you do not denounce it; rather you leap in to support the fiction by claiming those who challenge it to be engaged in “a desperate intent to demonize and I find it disgusting”.

      • Michael R. Kesti says:

        You have posted 377 more words, Steve, and yet you have addressed neither my question nor my statement.

        I am not surprised.

  6. Martin Light says:

    There you go again getting personal with the RACE CARD. Consider this:

    Our nation’s top historians reveal that the Democratic Party gave us the Ku Klux Klan, Black Codes, Jim Crow Laws and other repressive legislation which resulted in the multitude of murders, lynchings, mutilations, and intimidations (of thousands of black and white Republicans). On the issue of slavery: historians say the Democrats gave their lives to expand it, the Republicans gave their lives to ban it.

    The Democrats:
    • Democrats fought to expand slavery while Republicans fought to end it.
    • Democrats passed those discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws.
    • Democrats supported and passed the Missouri Compromise to protect slavery.
    • Democrats supported and passed the Kansas Nebraska Act to expand slavery.
    • Democrats supported and backed the Dred Scott Decision.
    • Democrats opposed educating blacks and murdered teachers.
    • Democrats fought against anti-lynching laws.
    • Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, is well known for having been a “Kleagle” in the Ku Klux Klan.
    • Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, personally filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for 14 straight hours to keep it from passage.
    • Democrats passed the Repeal Act of 1894 that overturned civil right laws enacted by Republicans.
    • Democrats declared that they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” than vote for a Republican, because the Republican Party was known as the party for blacks.
    • Democrat President Woodrow Wilson, reintroduced segregation throughout the federal government immediately upon taking office in 1913.
    • Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s first appointment to the Supreme Court was a life member of the Ku Klux Klan, Sen. Hugo Black, Democrat of Alabama.
    • Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s choice for vice president in 1944 was Harry Truman, who had joined the Ku Klux Klan in Kansas City in 1922.
    • Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt resisted Republican efforts to pass a federal law against lynching.
    • Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt opposed integration of the armed forces.
    • Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, Albert Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd were the chief opponents of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
    • Democrats supported and backed Judge John Ferguson in the case of Plessy v Ferguson.
    • Democrats supported the School Board of Topeka Kansas in the case of Brown v The Board of Education of Topeka Kansas.
    • Democrat public safety commissioner Eugene “Bull” Connor, in Birmingham, AL, unleashed vicious dogs and turned fire hoses on black civil rights demonstrators.
    • Democrats were who Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the other protesters were fighting.
    • Democrat Georgia Governor Lester Maddox “brandished an ax hammer to prevent blacks from patronizing his restaurant.
    • Democrat Governor George Wallace stood in front of the Alabama schoolhouse in 1963, declaring there would be segregation forever.
    • Democrat Arkansas Governor Faubus tried to prevent desegregation of Little Rock public schools.
    • Democrat Senator John F. Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil rights Act.
    • Democrat President John F. Kennedy opposed the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King.
    • Democrat President John F. Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI.
    • Democrat President Bill Clinton’s mentor was U.S. Senator J. William Fulbright, an Arkansas Democrat and a supporter of racial segregation.
    • Democrat President Bill Clinton interned for J. William Fulbright in 1966-67.
    • Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright signed the Southern Manifesto opposing the Supreme Court’s 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision.
    • Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright joined with the Dixiecrats in filibustering the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1964.
    • Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright voted against the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
    • Southern Democrats opposed desegregation and integration.

    Democrats opposed:
    1.   The Emancipation Proclamation
    2.   The 13th Amendment
    3.   The 14th Amendment
    4.   The 15th Amendment
    5.   The Reconstruction Act of 1867
    6.   The Civil Rights of 1866
    7.   The Enforcement Act of 1870
    8.   The Forced Act of 1871
    9.   The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871
    10. The Civil Rights Act of 1875
    11.  The Freeman Bureau
    12. The Civil Rights Act of 1957
    13. The Civil Rights Act of 1960
    14. The United State Civil Rights Commission

    Republicans gave strong bi-partisan support and sponsorship for the following
    legislation:
    1.   The Civil Rights Act of 1964
    2    The Voting Rights Act of 1965
    3.   The 1968 Civil Rights Acts
    4.   The Equal Opportunity Act of 1972
    5.   Goals and Timetables for Affirmative Action Programs
    6.   Comprehensive Employment Training Act of 1973
    7.   Voting Rights Act of Amendment of 1982
    8.   Civil Rights Act of 1983
    9.   Federal Contract Compliance and Workforce Development Act of 1988

    The Republicans:
    • Republicans enacted civil rights laws in the 1950’s and 1960’s, over the objection of Democrats.
    • Republicans founded the HBCU’s (Historical Black College’s and Universities) and started the NAACP to counter the racist practices of the Democrats.
    • Republicans pushed through much of the ground-breaking civil rights legislation in Congr ess.
    • Republicans fought slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom, citizenship and the right to vote.
    • Republicans pushed through much of the groundbreaking civil rights legislation from the 1860s through the 1960s.
    • Republican President Dwight Eisenhower sent troops into the South to desegregate the schools.
    • Republican President Eisenhower appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision.
    • Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, not Democrat President Lyndon Johnson, was the one who pushed through the civil rights laws of the 1960’s.
    • Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois wrote the language for the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
    • Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing.
    • Republican and black American, A. Phillip Randolph, organized the 1963 March by Dr. King on Washington.

    The 1964 Civil Rights Act Roll Call Vote: In the House, only 64 percent of the Democrats (153 yes, 91 no), but 80 percent of the Republicans (136 yes, 35 no), voted for it. In the Senate, while only 68 percent of the Democrats endorsed the bill (46 yes, 21 no), 82 percent of the Republicans voted to enact it (27 yes, 6 no).

    Thaddeus Stevens, a Radical Republican that introduced legislation in 1866 to give African Americans the so-called 40 acres and a mule and Democrats overwhelmingly voted against the bill.

    During the Senate debates on the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, it was revealed that members of the Democratic Party formed many terrorist organizations like the Ku Klux Klan to murder and intimidate African Americans voters. The Ku Klux Klan Act was a bill introduced by a Republican Congress to stop Klan Activities.

    History reveals that Democrats lynched, burned, mutilated and murdered thousands of blacks and completely destroyed entire towns and communities occupied by middle class Blacks, including Rosewood, Florida, the Greenwood District in Tulsa Oklahoma, and Wilmington, North Carolina to name a few.

    History reveals that it was Abolitionists and Radical Republicans such as Henry L. Morehouse and General Oliver Howard that started many of the traditional Black colleges, while Democrats fought to keep them closed. Many of our traditional Black colleges are named after white Republicans.

    After exclusively giving the Democrats their votes for the past 25 years, the average African American cannot point to one piece of civil rights legislation sponsored solely by the Democratic Party that was specifically designed to eradicate the unique problems that African Americans face today.

    As of 2004, the Democrat Party (the oldest political party in America) has never elected a black man to the United States Senate, the Republicans have elected three.

    Source: The KKK was the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party (http://realdemocrathistory.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/the-kkk-was-the-terrorist-wing-of-the-democrat-party/)

    • stevefrisch says:

      Hey Martin, you must have me confused with a Democrat–I am not a Democrat I am a Decline to State.

      You also must have the modern Republican Party confused with the historic Republican Party on civil rights. All of that went out the window when the Democrats embraced civil rights in the 1960’s and the Republicans embraced segregation and racism with the Southern Strategy in order to maintain political relevance.

      • Michael R. Kesti says:

        I, too, am registered as Decline to State but that didn’t stop you from erroneously judging me to be a birther.

        Have you considered attending classes in logic and critical thinking?

      • Steven,

        Please provide some proof that “Republicans embraced segregation and racism with the Southern Strategy in order to maintain political relevance.”

        Martin backed up his claims with some facts. Where are your?

      • stevefrisch says:

        What’s up Russ, you don;t know about the Southern Strategy? Who do you think you are fooling?

        Russ Replies: It does not matter what I understand, your owe the other readers of this blog some FACTS to back up your claims. Too hard?

  7. Steven,

    I never claimed that Obama was not born in Hawaii, which is the birther claim. I just wondered why he needed a fake birth certificate to prove it.

    Up to 1991 Obama claimed to have been born in Kenya. Here is a promotional bio published in 1991 in a booklet celebrating the fifteenth anniversary of Acton & Dystel, his publisher.

    Barack Obama, the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.  The son of an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister, he attended Columbia University and worked as a financial journalist and editor for Business International Corporation.   He served as project coordinator in Harlem for the New York Public Interest Research Group, and was Executive Director of the Developing Communities Project in Chicago’s South Side. His commitment to social and racial issues will be evident in his first book, Journeys in Black and White.

    More Details HERE.

    So, if he lied to his publisher, did he also lie on his collage applications? He admits to making up major portions of his autobiography. What other lies has he told?

    • stevefrisch says:

      This claim has been widely discredited and admitted as an editing error by the publisher.

      • Yes, the Bio was edited multiple times and the error was never corrected, until it was time to run for president. Why did it take 15 years to fined and fix the error? Was the editor that over looked the error for 15 years fired? We are stretching credibility here just a little bit!

      • stevefrisch says:

        The editors themselves said it was a mistake Russ.

  8. benjaminemery says:

    President Obama’s birth certificate or origin of birth would have never been an issue if he was white. That is why it is dog whistle racism.

  9. Arthur M. Day. says:

    That B.O.’s record as President is of no use to anyone as a defense of him is the main reason the nation needs him gone.

    • benjaminemery says:

      The only candidate for President worse than Obama on the Ballot is Romney. Vote Jill Stein, Gary Johnson, Rocky Anderson, or Buddy Roemer.

  10. Dixon Cruickshank says:

    There were white guys in Kenya, wouldn’t make him anymore American.

    Any person that had any doubt about their right to be President should be vetted, I’ll bet every one of you know McCain was born in Panama, because somebody checked.

    The point being nobody knows where he came from – literally – nobody ever knew him, he has never had any friends, nobody ever dated him, nobody ever went to school with him or lived next door to him.

    The point being nothing about the man adds up, nothing, and anything he does throw out makes no sense either. I hope it makes no difference in 3 months but for 4 years nobody has ever shown anything that was real – Russ is correct on all these points from the articles and yes I did live in the deep south and we had B/W water fountains when we went the ballgame in Tampa in ’56 – 59 at least, as I had never seen one – they sure weren’t called African American’s or Blacks – Negro’s was correct

  11. stevefrisch says:

    First, Dixon, as I said before, it is the combination of origin and ‘un-Ameircanism’ rhetoric that makes it racist.

    Second, I knew McCain was born in Panama because I read his story in a book about the Hanoi Hilton in the 1980’s.

    Third, numerous people who knew Obama as a child, as a teenager, as a student and as a young man have been interviewed over the years. Tons of people knew the guy. Students from his school in Indonesia have been interviewed. In Hawaii he was on the basketball team, but did not play much. At Columbia many students remember him, but by his own admission he was not the Big Man On Campus. Associated Press ran an article on people who knew him when he went to school in LA and at Columbia, and interviewed many. Obama wrote an article for the Columbia student newspaper. Cathie Curry who was at Columbia at the time was interviewed about her remembrances of him. Dozens of students at Occidental and Harvard have been interviewed. The entire ‘nobody knew him’ thing is pure fiction, a right wing urban myth. LOOK IT UP.

    Finally, Russ, and his source at the NYT are wrong about the use of the term African-American. It was used widely before Jesse Jackson picked it up as part of his presidential campaign in 1988. I myself used it when I lived in Chicago–it was street language–and it was used by the INS in official documents going back to the the 1950’s. You may have been calling people Negroes, or other things in the south, but those of us that listened to the kids we grew up with who were black and did not like the term negro learned to use other monikers (although I usually just tried to call people by their names…you know).

    You guys just look like idiots..which is fine by me…fits my narrative…stupid conservatives want to spend time talking about conspiracy theories rather than working to build a better America.

    Keep up the good work.

  12. Martin Light says:

    I’ve said this before and will say it again: Hey, Steve create your own blog.

    • stevefrisch says:

      Martin, I would much rather go to the source of the falsehood and fight it in its own front yard, ……you know kind of like the strategy for fighting terrorism!

      But nice job never actually addressing the point and attacking the messenger instead.

      Dixon, you want me to start trotting out public testimony from people who have know President Obama through his life while you claim he was in some dark hole, or do you concede the point!

  13. benjaminemery says:

    Here is the deal, Barack Hussein Obama is the President of the United States of America. It has shown me how deep and dangerous partisanship really is to our civil liberties. Also how much the democrats are owned by big business. Very little hope and even less change.

  14. Barry Pruett says:

    Wow…progressives like Frisch bringing out the race card. I guess this presidential race must already be over. Racism is the new, last refuge of a scoundrel.

    We will see this race card played by the left continually until November. Desperate accusations by a desperate candidate and his desperate supporters.

    • Todd Juvinall says:

      Frisch calls us “cracker” dudes. I think he thinks he is a black fellow. Dreamin I’d say in a south of the border way, wink wink.

  15. Arthur M. Day. says:

    Mr. Frisch and Mr. Emery, I think thou dost project a bit too much.

  16. smrstrauss says:

    Removed by Editor, this same post word for word came from another commenter. This could be concerted effort to muddy the water. Stay Tuned.

  17. ehancock1 says:

    In answer to the main article:

    Re: “In 1961 people of color were called “Negroes.” So how can the Obama “birth certificate” state he is “African-American” when the term wasn’t even used at that time?”

    ANSWER: First it does not say “African-American.” It says “African.” Only African.

    The explanation is simple. In Hawaii you were allowed to use any word you wanted to describe your race. There was no checklist, and no one stood over you saying what you had to enter. There are entries in Hawaii of people listing their race as “American.” So you were allowed to use any word you wanted.

    And what was the word that African exchange students commonly used to describe their race in the 1960s? Answer: African.

    Re: 2. “… Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known then as the “British East Africa Protectorate”.”

    Answer. You are out of date with that name. Kenya stopped being called the British East African Protectorate in 1920. In that year it was renamed. What was the name? THE KENYA COLONY.

    In short, it was called Kenya (Kenya short for “The Kenya Colony”), and it was in East Africa, so the entry Kenya, East Africa is correct.

    Re: “3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”. This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home”, respectively. ”

    Answer: You are referring to two other hospitals. But, Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital DID exist in 1961.

    How do we know? Well, on WND’s site there are birth certificates for the Nordkye Twins, born one day after Obama in the same hospital, and what is the name of the hospital on their birth certificates? Answer: Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital.

  18. Dixon Cruickshank says:

    We still more about a guy, his family, his parents,his chartiable contributions and their amount, his volunteer work, his elementary school days and pranks who isn’t even officially running for President yet than we know about a 4 yr incumbenent.

    Actually Russ knows more about me in Fla than he does about his President and he hasn’t met either one of us yet, pretty said

  19. benjaminemery says:

    Dixon,
    You have everything you mentioned right there for you to see but make the claim it isn’t legitimate information. My guess you would really like President Obama if you got to meet him. Just as I am sure if I met George W Bush outside a political setting I would probably like him. I like Barack Hussein Obama alot but don’t like the fact his administration embraced and even expanded on the Bush administration worst policies. It goes to show both party leaderships are corrupt and absent of justice with morality.

  20. Arthur M. Day. says:

    Mr. Emery: If you have a spare 3 seconds, tell us about B.O.’s successful policies.
    Mr. Romney’s sucessful life is in the public record, his performance as President will probably not deviate from that.
    B.O.’s performance in his term as President is also in the public record. A second B.O. term will definitely not deviate from that.

  21. benjaminemery says:

    Here is one. Consumer Protection Agency has protected consumers against fraudulent banking practices and paid for itself while holding big banks accountable. Hopefully there are bigger lawsuits in the near future against the banking industry, especially with the LIBOR scandal. This is one policy that strictly belongs to the Obama administration despite 100% republican opposition.

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/halahtouryalai/2012/07/18/obamas-consumer-protection-agency-strikes-210m-fine-for-capital-one/

  22. Arthur M. Day. says:

    The Consumer Protection Agency. He didn’t build that!

  23. Arthur M. Day. says:

    Love those crickets.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: